Skip to main content

Porter v. State

Citations

  • 629 S.E.2d 353
  • 368 S.C. 378
  • 2006 S.C. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding impeachment evidence was not material to guilt or punishment when the failure to disclose did not undermine confidence in the outcome of defendant’s trial
  • holding the fact that a witness did not identify the defendant at the crime scene was not material exculpatory evidence in view of other evidence of his guilt
  • stating this court gives great deference to the PCR court's findings of fact and conclusions of law
  • holding no evidence showed counsel’s failure to interview a potential witness would have yielded a result different from that which defendant’s counsel believed at the time of the plea; defendant pled guilty in light of the complete information that was available at that time
  • holding no evidence showed counsel’s failure to interview a potential witness would have yielded a result different from that which defendant’s counsel believed at the time of the plea; defendant pled guilty in light of the complete information that was available at that time
  • “Mere speculation of what a witness’ testimony may be is insufficient to satisfy the burden of showing prejudice in a petition for PCR.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.