Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/25/1994
Rayford v. State
Citations
- 443 S.E.2d 805
- 314 S.C. 46
- 1994 S.C. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a guilty plea voluntary where Respondent admitted committing the crimes, acknowledged the potential sentences, and stated that his plea had not been induced by promises
- finding the petitioner's guilty plea was voluntarily made when he admitted committing the crimes, acknowledged the potential sentences, and stated his plea was not induced by promises
- where transcript of guilty plea proceeding refuted applicant’s claim that he did not understand the terms of a plea bargain, grant of PCR was inappropriate notwithstanding applicant’s claim lawyer misadvised him
- where transcript of guilty plea proceeding refuted applicant’s claim that he did not understand the terms of a plea bargain, grant of PCR was inappropriate notwithstanding applicant’s claim lawyer misadvised him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bristow, Chandler, Finney, Toal, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roddy v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 33×
- Wolfe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-05-12· cited 25×
- Roscoe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-30· cited 16×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 11×
- Stalk v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.