Rollins, Inc. v. Butland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that actual damages under FDUTPA do not include consequential damages, diminution in value damages, or stigma damages
• holding that actual damages under FDUTPA do not include consequential damages, diminution in value damages, or stigma damages
• holding that a private individual seeking a consumer claim for damages under FDUTPA has to prove actual damages
• holding that a private individual seeking a consumer claim for damages under FDUTPA has to prove actual damages
• holding that a private individual seeking a consumer claim for damages under FDUTPA has to prove actual damages
• holding that proving allegations of deficient performance by pest control company of class of 65,000 purchasers of termite contract through \collective proof\ would, \[b]y any standard ... amount to a violation of substantive due process of law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).