Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Petsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 501.211 allows consumers to recover damages for only the diminished value of the services received
• holding that section 501.211 allows consumers to recover damages for only the diminished value of the services received
• holding that because arbitration agreement did not specifically deny the plaintiff his right to raise statutory claims in arbitration, the arbitration agreement would not be read to eliminate those claims so as to render the agreement unenforceable
• holding that when the arbitration agreement was in large print on the first page of the contract and when the plaintiff had the opportunity to read it and decide whether to seek services elsewhere, the provision was not procedurally unconscionable
• noting that claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act may be submitted to arbitration
• noting that although party “sought special, consequential, and incidental damages . . ., those damages are not available under FDUTPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).