Rollins, Inc. v. Heller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is unnecessary to pierce the corporate veil because the individual defendant was a direct participant in the dealings
• noting that it is unnecessary to pierce the corporate veil because individual defendant was a direct participant in the dealings
• finding that FDUTPA claim against parent company was not precluded by the fact that the contract for service was with a subsidiary as the parent company was a direct participant in the dealings with the consumers
• noting it is unnecessary to pierce the corporate veil because the individual defendant was a direct participant in the dealings
• finding where a home was burglarized following the installation of a deficient security system, the actual damages constituted the cost of the defective system, not the value of the items stolen during the burglary
• finding where a home was burglarized following the installation of a deficient security system, the actual damages constituted the cost of the defective system, not the value of the items stolen during the burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).