Luis Virgilio v. Terrabrook Vista Lakes, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs failed to confer a benefit on defendants where the relationship alleged by plaintiffs with defendants was indirect
• concluding that “whether or not a duty to disclose is an element of a FDUTPA claim,” plaintiff had only alleged a breach of a duty to disclose and plaintiff was not subject to such a duty
• affirming the dismissal of an unjust enrichment claim under Florida law because the plaintiffs only “ ‘indirectly’ conferred a benefit on Defendants”
• finding no benefit conferred where the defendant was not a party to the plaintiffs’ service contract with an intermediary
• finding third party, and not the plaintiffs, conferred the relevant benefit 16 where third party “bargained away” its rights to the benefit
• declining to decide “whether or not a duty to disclose is an element of a FDUTPA claim” based on an omission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).