Eleventh Circuit· 2/5/2009

United Technologies Corp. v. Mazer

Citations

556 F.3d 1260
78 Fed. R. Serv. 784
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Florida’s long-arm statute can support jurisdiction over any alleged conspirator where another co-conspirator commits an act in Florida in furtherance of the conspiracy
concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to review “inadmissable [sic] hearsay” to determine whether it could exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant
holding that “[a] court without personal jurisdiction is powerless to take further action”
concluding at summary judgment stage that FDLE report containing summaries of conversations with and sworn statements by non-parties is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay
explaining that “Rule 8(d) ... expressly permits the pleading of both alternative and inconsistent claims”
explaining that plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Marcus, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.