Skip to main content

Sims v. State

Citations

  • 273 S.W.3d 291
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 820
  • 2008 WL 2596950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that character evidence in the form of opinion testimony may be admissible during punishment trial, even if the opinion testimony is based upon facts brought forth from extraneous-offense testimony
  • holding that character evidence in the form of opinion testimony may be admissible during punishment trial, even if the opinion testimony is based upon facts brought forth from extraneous-offense testimony
  • holding that relevance is “a question of what is helpful . . . in determining the appropriate sentence” (quoting Ellison v. State, 201 S.W.3d 714, 719 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006))
  • explaining that testimony that defendant lied to police officer was relevant at punishment to determine defendant’s ability to complete demands of supervision
  • explaining that testimony that defendant lied to police officer was relevant at punishment to determine defendant’s ability to complete demands of supervision
  • explaining that testimony that defendant lied to police officer was relevant at punishment to determine defendant’s ability to complete demands of supervision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.