Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 203 S.W.3d 837
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1931
  • 2006 WL 2861117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling a Rule 403 objection where evidence was probative of the appellant’s moral blameworthiness
  • noting that extraneous offenses committed by other parties to the offense were helpful to the jury “in determining Appellant’s moral blameworthiness”
  • during punishment phase of trial, trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling a Rule 403 objection where evidence was probative of the appellant’s moral blameworthiness
  • during punishment phase of trial, trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling a Rule 403 objection where evidence was probative of the appellant's moral blameworthiness
  • we are required to uphold the trial court's decision when its decision is within the zone of reasonable disagreement
  • “[W]e review a trial court’s decision regarding the admissibility of evidence under an abuse of discretion standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Keller, Price, Womack, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Johnson, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

147 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.