Skip to main content

Gilliam v. State

Citations

  • 901 N.E.2d 72
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 284
  • 2009 WL 455259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a single aggravating circumstance, such as the presence of multiple victims, may justify the imposition of consecutive sentences
  • noting that the presence of multiple victims may justify the imposition of consecutive sentences
  • stating “a single aggravating circumstance may justify the imposition of consecutive sentences” and “[t]he presence of multiple victims is one such aggravating circumstance”
  • “The decision to impose consecutive sentences lies within the discretion of the trial court ...” and “a single aggraváting circumstance may justify the imposition of consecutive sentences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Friedlander, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.