Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Indiana Supreme Court· 12/13/2005

Ryle v. State

Citations

  • 842 N.E.2d 320
  • 2005 Ind. LEXIS 1112
  • 2005 WL 3378469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court’s reliance on presentence investigation report to prove defendant was on parole is equivalent to reliance on “judicial record[s] that guarantee the conclusive significance that is the focus of Apprendi” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • holding that whether the defendant “was on probation when he committed the present offense, a fact reflected in the presentence investigation report,” was not a fact that “needs to be proven before a jury”
  • holding that whether the defendant “was on probation when he committed the present offense, a fact reflected in the presentence investigation report,” was not a fact that “needs to be proven before a jury”
  • compiling cases and concluding that the Third, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits include juvenile convictions in the prior-conviction exception, even though juveniles do not always have the right to jury trial
  • compiling cases and concluding that the Third, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits include juvenile convictions in the prior-conviction exception, even though juveniles do not always have the right to jury trial
  • observing that “[p]robation stands on its own as an aggravator”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ryle v. State

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.