Indiana Court of Appeals· 4/23/2009

Upton v. State

Citations

904 N.E.2d 700
2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 839
2009 WL 1108883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that application of the credit restricted felon statute to criminal acts which occurred before the statute’s enactment is an ex post facto violation
asserting that the trial court properly identified the presence of multiple victims as justifying consecutive sentences despite the trial court’s brief statement that the sentence should avoid “minimiz[ing] the significance of the [defendant’s] horrendous acts”
reversing CRF status after the State conceded that its application was an ex post facto violation
finding ex post facto violation in trial court‟s application of CRF 3 statute to defendant whose offenses pre-dated statute‟s July 1, 2008 effective date
finding consecutive sentences for child molesting offenses appropriate where Upton molested multiple victims
Trial court’s finding that defendant had sexually molested multiple victims was permissible aggravating factor in support of order that sentences run consecutively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Crone, Bradford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.