Skip to main content

Robertson v. State

Citations

  • 187 S.W.3d 475
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 576
  • 2006 WL 709305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient where counsel elicited testimony of two convictions that the state was barred from introducing for purposes of impeachment
  • holding that the “right to effective assistance of counsel merely ensures the right to reasonably effective [not perfect] assistance.”
  • holding that ..: where defense. depended on defendant's credibility, there was no possible 7 reasonable strategy and defense counsel rendered deficient performance by intentionally eliciting and opening the door to otherwise inadmissible evidence
  • holding that trial counsel performed deficiently by “allowing the jury to hear prejudicial and clearly inadmissible evidence because this evidence could serve no strategic value including demonstrating that appellant is not a liar”
  • explaining that one is ensured the right to reasonably effective assistance of counsel, not perfect assistance
  • holding trial counsel performed deficiently for introducing evi dence that would have been inadmissible under Rule 404(b) if offered by the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

648 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Robertson v. State

273 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.