Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 669 A.2d 1
  • 1995 WL 361171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \This list offers examples of purposes for which evidence of prior wrongs could be admitted; it is not exclusive.\
  • “This list offers examples of purposes for which evidence of prior wrongs could be admitted; it is not exclusive.”
  • when a licensee does not supply a sufficient breath sample and does not exert a total conscious effort, it is considered a refusal to submit to a test
  • evidence of repeated acts of violence admitted to establish course of conduct to show victim’s lack of consent to sexual intercourse and to explain why she recanted her prior statements and testified that sexual relations were consensual
  • “If the trial court is satisfied that the evidence meets [the Getz] standards, it may be admitted, but the evidence should be the subject of a jury instruction explaining the limited purpose for which it was introduced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Hartnett, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.