· 1/22/1999
Seward v. State
Citations
- 723 A.2d 365
- 1999 Del. LEXIS 24
- 1999 WL 38833
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that exigent circumstances existed because the defendant did knew that he was under investigation making the police’s belief that he would destroy evidence reasonable
- “This Court reviews evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion.” (citing Weber v. State, 547 A.2d 948, 955 (Del. 1988))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walsh, Holland, Hartnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.