Skip to main content
· 1/22/1999

Seward v. State

Citations

  • 723 A.2d 365
  • 1999 Del. LEXIS 24
  • 1999 WL 38833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that exigent circumstances existed because the defendant did knew that he was under investigation making the police’s belief that he would destroy evidence reasonable
  • “This Court reviews evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion.” (citing Weber v. State, 547 A.2d 948, 955 (Del. 1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walsh, Holland, Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.