Kurzmann v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that reunification services were feasible when father was released from incarceration less than thirty days after the paternity determination
• finding that reunification services were feasible when father was released from incarceration less than thirty days after the paternity determination
• noting that reunification services are not required in cases of abandonment
• finding that the record did not support a finding that the Superior Court sentenced the defendant with a closed mind when the court considered the nature of the offense and the defendant’s character when fashioning the defendant’s VOP sentence
• rejecting defendant’s argument that the State was required to charge and prosecute him for a crime arising out of conduct for which the State could also proceed in a VOP hearing
• appearing to apply a de novo standard to clear and convincing evidence review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).