Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an intervening legal decision may establish an exception to the law of the case doctrine
• holding: “The doctrine of the law of the case requires that questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings”
• noting also that “the law of the case doctrine may foreclose subsequent consideration of issues implicitly addressed or necessarily considered by the appellate court’s decision”
• noting also that “the law of the case doctrine may foreclose subsequent consideration of issues implicitly addressed or necessarily considered by the appellate court’s decision”
• applying law of the case doctrine to appellate court’s granting of motion for appellate fees
• listing “a final judgment on the merits” as an essential element of claim preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).