Skip to main content

Castro v. State

Citations

  • 547 So. 2d 111
  • 1989 WL 77504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding collateral crime evidence that defendant was an escaped convict was presumptively harmful
  • deeming a trial court’s error in allowing a witness to testify about the defendant’s previous collateral act harmless, because it did not influence the most incriminating evidence against the defendant, which was “his own confession”
  • \[I]t is not enough to show that the evidence against a defendant was overwhelming. Error is harmless only if it can be said beyond a reasonable doubt that the verdict could not have been affected by the error.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.