Butler v. Yusem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “consequent injury by the party acting in reliance on the representation” is an element of fraudulent misrepresentation
• stating that the elements of fraud are (1) a false statement of material fact, (2) the defendant's knowledge that the statement is false, (3) the defendant's intention that the statement induce reliance, and (4
• clarifying that “[j]ustifiable reliance is not a necessary element of fraudulent misrepresentation”
• reiterating justifiable reliance is an element of a negligent misrepresentation claim but not a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation
• reiterating justifiable reliance is an element of a negligent misrepresentation claim but not a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation
• requiring proof that the representor knew his representa- tions were false

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).