Skip to main content

Richmond v. State

Citations

  • 59 P.3d 1249
  • 118 Nev. 924
  • 118 Nev. Adv. Rep. 94
  • 2002 Nev. LEXIS 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that erroneous admission of prior bad act evidence is harmless \where overwhelming evidence supports the conviction\
  • Shearing, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Young, C.J., and Agosti, J., agreed
  • noting that state courts are generally free to determine retroactivity of new rules of state law and holding that this court will apply new rules of state law to cases pending on direct appeal only when the issue has been properly preserved for appeal
  • weighing into its denial of a mistrial motion that a witness's remarks that the defendant had been in jail were brief and not purposefully solicited by the attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Maupin, Shearing, Leavitt, Becker, Young, Agosti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.