Nevada Supreme Court· 12/27/2002
Richmond v. State
Citations
- 59 P.3d 1249
- 118 Nev. 924
- 118 Nev. Adv. Rep. 94
- 2002 Nev. LEXIS 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that erroneous admission of prior bad act evidence is harmless \where overwhelming evidence supports the conviction\
- Shearing, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Young, C.J., and Agosti, J., agreed
- noting that state courts are generally free to determine retroactivity of new rules of state law and holding that this court will apply new rules of state law to cases pending on direct appeal only when the issue has been properly preserved for appeal
- weighing into its denial of a mistrial motion that a witness's remarks that the defendant had been in jail were brief and not purposefully solicited by the attorneys
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Maupin, Shearing, Leavitt, Becker, Young, Agosti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nunnery v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 126×
- Weber v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-09-15· cited 109×
- Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-05-26· cited 109×
- Grey v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 74×
- Ledbetter v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-03-16· cited 55×
- State v. FavelMontana Supreme Court· 2015-12-02· cited 49×
- Williams v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-12-29· cited 45×
- Johnson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 42×
- Tabish v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2003-07-14· cited 41×
- Newman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2013-04-18· cited 40×
- Flores v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 39×
- Abbott v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-13· cited 36×
- Lobato v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 33×
- Rhymes v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 28×
- Pineda v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-04· cited 24×
- Cripps v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-20· cited 22×
- Clem v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2003-12-30· cited 21×
- Thomas v. HardwickNevada Supreme Court· 2010-05-27· cited 19×
- Bronneke v. RutherfordNevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-12· cited 13×
- Bennett v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 6×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court· 1965-11-15· cited 740×
- Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court· 1966-01-19· cited 593×
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 358×
- Petrocelli v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1985-01-04· cited 199×
- American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Third Circuit· 1985-02-01· cited 115×
- Tavares v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2001-09-17· cited 101×
- United States v. GravesFifth Circuit· 1993-10-20· cited 93×
- Nester v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1959-01-20· cited 86×
- Tinch v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 70×
- Daly v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 59×
- Braunstein v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-02-13· cited 55×
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 53×
- Paulino Izaguirre Rojas v. Robert Richardson, Kenneth McGee and M and R Cattle Company, a PartnershipFifth Circuit· 1983-08-29· cited 52×
- McMichael v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1978-04-07· cited 52×
- Garner v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-23· cited 50×
- Cordova v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-21· cited 34×
- Mitchell v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1989-11-27· cited 33×
- Findley v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1978-04-24· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.