Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 967 P.2d 1111
  • 114 Nev. 1127
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a coordinated series of acts furthering the underlying offense is sufficient to infer the existence of an agreement, and thus is sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of conspiracy
  • explaining that conspiracy is seldom supported by direct proof and is generally established by inferences drawn from the parties conduct
  • holding jury may infer agreement for conspiracy conviction from coordinated series of acts
  • following Steese in concluding that “a meat-carving knife with a five- to seven-inch blade” was a deadly weapon
  • noting that conspiracy is seldom proven through direct evidence
  • discussing the laying of foundation in the context of admitting business records under NRS 51.135 and recognizing that \Nile government need only make a prima facie showing of authenticity so that a reasonable juror could find that the document is what it purports to be\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.