Nevada Supreme Court· 11/25/1998
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 967 P.2d 1111
- 114 Nev. 1127
- 1998 Nev. LEXIS 134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a coordinated series of acts furthering the underlying offense is sufficient to infer the existence of an agreement, and thus is sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of conspiracy
- explaining that conspiracy is seldom supported by direct proof and is generally established by inferences drawn from the parties conduct
- holding jury may infer agreement for conspiracy conviction from coordinated series of acts
- following Steese in concluding that “a meat-carving knife with a five- to seven-inch blade” was a deadly weapon
- noting that conspiracy is seldom proven through direct evidence
- discussing the laying of foundation in the context of admitting business records under NRS 51.135 and recognizing that \Nile government need only make a prima facie showing of authenticity so that a reasonable juror could find that the document is what it purports to be\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rose v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2007-07-26· cited 154×
- Nunnery v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 126×
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-02-10· cited 121×
- Kaczmarek v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-06-07· cited 112×
- Rhyne v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-01-16· cited 80×
- Rowland v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 60×
- Richmond v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-27· cited 56×
- Summers v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 55×
- Krause Inc. v. LittleNevada Supreme Court· 2001-11-21· cited 52×
- Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 33×
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 27×
- Clem v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2003-12-30· cited 21×
- Libby v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1999-04-02· cited 20×
- BURNSIDE (TIMOTHY) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY/DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court· 2015-06-25
- RIMER (STANLEY) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2015-06-11
- Knight (Wilbert) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-11-09
- Kemp (Terrell) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-09-16
- Skarpelos v. Weiser Asset Mgmt., Ltd. C/W 79526Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-03-03
- THOMAS (MARLO) v. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-PC)Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-05-26
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- California v. BrownSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,207×
- People v. ChampionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 312×
- People v. BeelerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-04-10· cited 218×
- Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1981-02-25· cited 198×
- Wilkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 117×
- United States v. James Franklin Ray, United States of America v. James Franklin RayNinth Circuit· 1991-04-23· cited 79×
- United States v. William Lee WorkingerNinth Circuit· 1996-07-23· cited 76×
- Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-07-22· cited 71×
- Wesley v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-04-30· cited 70×
- Steese v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-05-19· cited 59×
- Lisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 50×
- Browne v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-02-26· cited 50×
- Parker v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1993-04-02· cited 48×
- Zgombic v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1990-09-13· cited 47×
- Scott v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1976-09-30· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.