Skip to main content

Garner v. State

Citations

  • 6 P.3d 1013
  • 1 Nev. 770
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 85
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that our holding in Byford v. State, 116 Nev. 215, 994 P.2d 700 (2000), does not apply retroactively
  • holding that this court does not consider retroactive application of new rules unless they involve a constitutional dimension
  • holding that this court does not consider retroactive application of new rules unless they involve a constitutional dimension
  • holding that this court does not consider retroactive application of new rules unless they involve a constitutional dimension
  • concluding that our holding in Byford v. State, 116 Nev. 215, 994 P.2d 700 (2000), does not apply retroactively
  • holding that this court does not consider retroactive application of new rules unless they involve a constitutional dimension

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.