Skip to main content

Newman v. State

Citations

  • 129 Nev. 222
  • 298 P.3d 1171
  • 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 24
  • 2013 WL 1715252
  • 2013 Nev. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district coures decision to admit or exclude prior-bad-act evidence is subject to review for an abuse of discretion
  • providing erroneous admission of evidence harmless unless it had substantial and injurious effect on verdict
  • providing erroneous admission of evidence harmless unless it had substantial and injurious effect on verdict
  • barring extrinsic testimony about a specific altercation that was fundamentally distinct from the offense charged and not offered to rebut a particular assertion
  • reviewing the adrnission of prior misconduct evidence for an abuse of discretion
  • A nonconstitutional error, such as the erroneous admission of evidence at issue here, is deemed harmless unless it had a \substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickering, Hardesty, Cherry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.