Nevada Supreme Court· 9/3/2004

Lobato v. State

Citations

120 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 57
120 Nev. 512
96 P.3d 765
120 Nev. Adv. Rep. 57
2004 Nev. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that \any error that does not affect a defendant's substantial rights shall be disregarded\
stating that \any error that does not affect a defendant's substantial rights shall be disregarded\
stating that \any error that does not affect a defendant's substantial rights shall be disregarded\
noting that a witness's prior inconsistent statements may be used to impeach that witness
discussing the various methods of impeachment, including attacks upon a witness's competence to testify or a witness's reputation for truthfulness, the use of prior convictions, prior inconsistent statements, specific instances of conduct, and ulterior motives to testify
whether the contact “undermine[d] confidence in the outcome”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Rose, Maupin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.