Skip to main content

Cordova v. State

Citations

  • 1 Nev. 664
  • 6 P.3d 481
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 78
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that one party may open the door to the introduction of otherwise inadmissible evidence
  • explaining that one party may open the door to the introduction of otherwise inadmissible evidence
  • stressing that a law enforcement witness cannot opine on the question of SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1447A fq 11141-11 , guilt or innocence
  • the substitution of the word \may\ for \shall\ in an implied malice instruction is preferable because it eliminates the mandatory presumption
  • \An expert may not comment on a witness's veracity.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Maupin, Shearing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.