Research Corp. Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[p]ublication [to the scientific community] is an act inconsistent with an intent to conceal data from the USPTO.”
• stating that ”[t]he Federal Circuit applies its own law with respect to issues of substantive patent law and certain procedural issues pertaining to patent law, but applies the law of our sister circuits to non-patent issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Research Corp. Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-12-08· cited 93×
• Meyer Intellectual Properties Ltd. v. Bodum, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-08-15· cited 68×
• Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-12-22· cited 65×
• Intouch Technologies, Inc. v. Vgo Communications, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-05-09· cited 63×
• TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 51×
• Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
  Federal Circuit· 2011-12-01· cited 38×
• Osram Sylvania, Inc. v. American Induction Technologies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-13· cited 38×
• Pregis Corp. v. Kappos
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-06· cited 35×
• Cancer Research Technology Limited and Schering v. Barr Laboratories
  Federal Circuit· 2010-11-09· cited 33×
• Baden Sports, Inc. v. Molten USA, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-02-13· cited 33×
• Superior Industries, LLC v. Thor Global Enterprises Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-11-27· cited 25×
• Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Trans Video Electronics, Ltd.
  N.D. California· 2013-09-30· cited 18×
• Garber v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-26· cited 16×
• Rowe International Corp. v. Ecast, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2008-08-25· cited 14×
• Honeywell International Inc. v. ICM Controls Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2014-08-27· cited 12×
• Simmons v. Cook
  S.D. Ohio· 2010-03-29· cited 7×
• Cancer Research Technology v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2010-01-26· cited 5×
• Serverside Group Ltd. v. Tactical 8 Technologies, L.L.C.
  N.D. Iowa· 2013-12-09· cited 3×
• Voda v. Medtronic Inc.
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2011-12-14

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Liteky v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
• General Electric Co. v. Joiner
  Supreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
• Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister Incorporated
  Federal Circuit· 1988-12-21· cited 553×
• Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1994-02-15· cited 319×
• Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-05-05· cited 262×
• The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-08-11· cited 210×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-01-18· cited 154×
• McCalden v. California Library Ass'n
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-11-20· cited 154×
• Nazomi Communications, Inc. v. Arm Holdings, Plc
  Federal Circuit· 2005-04-11· cited 125×
• Cargill, Inc. v. Canbra Foods, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-02-14· cited 116×
• Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Calgene, Inc., Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-09-24· cited 106×
• In Re Cambridge Biotech Corporation Institut Pasteur and Genetic Systems Corporation v. Cambridge Biotech Corporation, Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-07-07· cited 77×
• Jerry Gechter, Robert L. Pokress, Jeffrey A. Fried, and G. Wayne Andrews v. Wayne A. Davidson and Diana S. Winter
  Federal Circuit· 1997-06-12· cited 74×
• United States v. Jeffrey H. Feingold
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-07-21· cited 69×
• Group One Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2005-06-13· cited 45×
• Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc., Unique Beverage Dispensers, Inc., David Fox, and Bruce Burwick
  Federal Circuit· 2004-09-03· cited 29×
• Flex-Rest, LLC v. Steelcase, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-07-13· cited 28×
• Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-07-31· cited 7×