Garber v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Smith in holding that the parties’ agreement satisfied the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) despite deviations from the standard form, i.e., the inclusion of an additional proposed order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).