Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Circuit· 6/9/2010

TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.

Citations

  • 608 F.3d 1333
  • 95 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1577
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 11700
  • 2010 WL 2292312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing summary judgment where genuine issues of material fact surrounded anticipation
  • “A federal appellate court does not con- sider an issue not passed upon below.” (quoting Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976))
  • district court must state its reasons for granting summary judgment when its underlying holdings would otherwise be ambiguous or unascertainable
  • “[A] moving party seeking to invalidate a patent at summary judgment must submit such clear and convincing evidence of facts underlying invalidity that no reasonable jury could find otherwise.”
  • “We have repeatedly held that evidence of secondary considerations must be considered if present. ... There is no indication in the record that, as required by our precedent, the court considered at all the evidence of secondary considerations offered by TriMed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Linn, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.