The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an injunction may reach non-infringing activities, but that “[i]t is necessary . . . that the injunction prevent infringe- ment” of a patent
• “As a general rule, an appellate court will not hear on appeal issues that were not clearly raised in the proceedings below.”
• “An associative information table provides additional facts, such as unit standard features, unit history of failures, model failure propensity, etc.”
• “As a general rule, an appellate court will not hear on appeal issues that were not clearly raised in the proceedings below.”
• “Monoclonal antibodies, which are uniform in their binding properties, are produced by cloned cells known as hybri-domas.”
• a court's claim construction opinion may provide a basis for a defendant to cite additional invalidating art when the claim construction “change[s] the rules of the game”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).