Research Corp. Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[p]ublication [to the scientific community] is an act inconsistent with an intent to conceal data from the USPTO.”
• stating that ”[t]he Federal Circuit applies its own law with respect to issues of substantive patent law and certain procedural issues pertaining to patent law, but applies the law of our sister circuits to non-patent issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).