Pregis Corp. v. Kappos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] third party cannot sue the PTO under the APA to challenge a PTO decision to issue a patent.”
• “The carefully balanced framework of the Patent Act spec- ifies a well-defined process for how, when, where, and by whom PTO patentability determinations may be chal- lenged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-07-09· cited 108×
• Nike, Inc. v. Adidas Ag
  Federal Circuit· 2016-02-11· cited 47×
• Odyssey Logistics and Tech. v. Iancu
  Federal Circuit· 2020-05-22· cited 14×
• Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-02-26· cited 13×
• Security People, Inc. v. Iancu
  Federal Circuit· 2020-08-20· cited 11×
• Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC v. Lee
  Federal Circuit· 2015-03-26· cited 9×
• Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2014-01-14· cited 8×
• alarm.com Incorporated v. Hirshfeld
  Federal Circuit· 2022-02-24· cited 7×
• Versata Development Corp. v. Rea
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-08-07· cited 7×
• Dome Patent, L.P. v. Rea
  District of Columbia· 2014-07-01· cited 3×
• Serverside Group Ltd. v. Tactical 8 Technologies, L.L.C.
  N.D. Iowa· 2013-12-09· cited 3×
• Bacardi and Company Limited v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
  Fourth Circuit· 2024-06-13· cited 3×
• Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Technologies Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-01-29· cited 2×
• Medtronic, Inc. v. Lee
  E.D. Virginia· 2016-01-21· cited 1×
• Racing Optics, Inc. v. Aevoe Corp.
  D. Nevada· 2016-07-14

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City
  Supreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
• Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp
  Supreme Court· 1970-03-03· cited 3,186×
• MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 1,786×
• KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
• Dickinson v. Zurko
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 997×
• Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 958×
• Block v. Community Nutrition Institute
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 935×
• Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 825×
• In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. Norton
  Federal Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 665×
• Dunlop v. Bachowski
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-02· cited 568×
• Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1988-07-29· cited 421×
• Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-05-05· cited 262×
• ACCO Brands, Inc. v. ABA Locks Manufacturer Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-12· cited 170×
• Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corporation v. Elekta Ab, Elekta Instrument Ab, Elekta Instruments, Inc., and Elekta Oncology Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-10-30· cited 163×
• Ormco Corporation v. Align Technology
  Federal Circuit· 2006-08-30· cited 159×
• Garcia v. Vilsack
  D.C. Circuit· 2009-04-24· cited 118×
• Lnp Engineering Plastics, Inc. And Kawasaki Chemical Holding Co., Inc. v. Miller Waste Mills, Inc. (Trading as Rtp Company), Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2001-12-21· cited 87×
• Para-Ordnance Manufacturing, Inc. v. Sgs Importers International, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1996-03-20· cited 86×
• Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-04-29· cited 82×
• In Re Daniel S. Fulton and James Huang
  Federal Circuit· 2004-12-02· cited 78×