Nazomi Communications, Inc. v. Arm Holdings, Plc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim may \embrac[e] different subject matter than is illustrated in the specific embodiments in the specification\
• explaining that the scope of the claims may “embrac[e] different subject matter than is illustrated in the specific embodiments in the specification”
• explaining that, “normally . . . limitations stated in de- pendent claims are not to be read into the independent claim from which they depend” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• remanding issues of claim construction and infringement based in part on the district court’s failure to provide sufficient reasoning for its decision
• claims may embrace \different subject matter than is illustrated in the specific embodiments in the specification\
• claims may embrace “different subject matter than is illustrated in the specific embodiments in the specification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).