Reinert v. Larkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Miranda custody established where defendant made statement in ambulance to law enforcement officer with emergency medical technician present
• defendant was questioned in ambulance while IV was inserted into his arm and he was ‘‘hooked up to an electrocardio- graph’’
• no Seibert violation where police appear to have unintentionally neglected to administer Miranda warnings at the outset of questioning
• “[W]e, as a federal court sitting in habeas jurisdiction, would not have the authority to review a violation of the state constitution.”
• hold- ing that defendant, while being transported in ambu- lance in presence of police officer, was not in custody when he made first statement but was in custody when he made second statement
• hold- ing that defendant, while being transported in ambu- lance in presence of police officer, was not in custody when he made first statement but was in custody when he made second statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).