· 9/26/2005
United States v. Adolfo Naranjo
Citations
- 426 F.3d 221
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20870
- 2005 WL 2334687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that a failure to warn would not be deliberate where it resulted from a “rookie mistake”
- remanding in order for district court to make a “finding” with respect to deliberateness
- government agreed defendant’s pre-Miranda statements could not be used at trial so only issue before court was admissibility of post-Miranda statements
- “[Ujnless the agents deliberately withheld warnings, Elstad controls [the defendant’s] Miranda claim.”
- applying clear- error standard of review
- applying clear-error standard of review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alito, McKEE, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.