Skip to main content
· 9/26/2005

United States v. Adolfo Naranjo

Citations

  • 426 F.3d 221
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20870
  • 2005 WL 2334687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that a failure to warn would not be deliberate where it resulted from a “rookie mistake”
  • remanding in order for district court to make a “finding” with respect to deliberateness
  • government agreed defendant’s pre-Miranda statements could not be used at trial so only issue before court was admissibility of post-Miranda statements
  • “[Ujnless the agents deliberately withheld warnings, Elstad controls [the defendant’s] Miranda claim.”
  • applying clear- error standard of review
  • applying clear-error standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito, McKEE, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.