United States v. Nopporn Sriyuth, A/K/A Thi Nopporn Sriyuth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where a District Court has not adequately set forth its basis for determining the admissibility of evidence (there under Rule 403), we may remand to the district court for clarification or even for a new trial
• finding evidence to be “strongly probative because it counters two central arguments advanced by [the defendant]”
• referring to “the Laotian custom of arranged marriages”
• Thai immigrant in U.S. for 9 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).