Skip to main content
· 7/5/1967

Cirack v. State

Citations

  • 201 So. 2d 706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • self-serving statements of intoxication alone provide no basis for expert testimony as to whether a defendant was able to distinguish right and wrong at the time of the murder
  • finding the standard instruction on insanity did not apprise the jury of the defense of involuntary intoxication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.