Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 4/21/1997

R.B. Ventures, Ltd. v. Shane

Citations

  • 112 F.3d 54
  • 1997 WL 189316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a factfinder must determine whether plaintiffs involvement in initial real-estate development proposal, which was not built, entitled plaintiff to a commission for completed second proposal, which involved plans similar to those for the initial proposal
  • “If there is any evidence in the record from any source from which a reasonable inference in the nonmoving party’s favor may be drawn, the moving party simply cannot obtain a summary judgment.” (alterations and quotations marks omitted)
  • “If there is any evidence in the record from any source from which a reasonable inference in the nonmoving party’s favor may be drawn, the moving party simply cannot obtain a summary judgment.” (alterations and quotations marks omitted)
  • discussing quantum meruit and unjust enrichment together

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Kearse, Kelleher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named R.B. Ventures, Ltd. v. Shane

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.