Murray v. Visiting Nurse Services of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff’s internal complaints “clearly satisf[ied]” the “knowledge” element of a prima facie case of retaliation (citing Gordon, 232 F.3d at 116; Reed, 95 F.3d at 1178; Campbell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 03CV1421(KMK)(HBP
• collecting cases suggesting that two to three months is often regarded as the maximum for temporal proximity supporting an inference of causation
• collecting cases suggesting that two to three months is often regarded as the maximum for temporal proximity supporting an inference of causation
• collecting cases requiring a temporal gap of three months or less between the protected activity and the retaliatory act to establish causation
• finding male-to- male statements in the workplace such as “you’re such a bitch,” “good morning ladies,” “when are you going to come out of the closet,” and “are you ladies going to the parade?” insufficient to defeat summary judgment on hostile work environment claim
• “[C]ase law in the Second Circuit and in this district often finds a limit at two or three months and almost universally disapproves longer time periods.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).