Globalnet financial.com, Inc. v. Frank Crystal & Co., Inc., A.I. Credit Corp., Docket No. 04-6679-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state did not have the greatest interest in a tort arising from an insurance relationship merely because the ultimate insurance risk would be borne in that state
• noting that with disputes involving insurance policies, New York courts have looked at factors such as where the policy was issued and delivered, the location of the broker or agent placing the policy, and the insurer’s place of business
• explaining that under Schultz, “torts are divided into two types”
• describing New York’s interest-analysis test and noting that the “site of the tort is the controlling factor” for “conduct-regulating laws”
• “The relevant analytical approach to choice of law in tort actions in New York is the interest analysis.”
• “The relevant analytical approach to choice of law in tort actions in New York is the interest analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).