In Re Publication Paper Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reasonable inference need not be the sole possible inference
• analyzing three parallel price increases in the context of private meetings and phone calls that occurred shortly before them
• finding noteworthy the fact that the defendants “disclosed to each other their companies’ intentions to increase prices before those decisions had been publicly announced!’
• finding an industry conducive to collusion where the product had “few substitutes”
• “[T]he range of inferences that may be drawn from [ambiguous] evidence depends on the plausibility of the plaintiffs theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).