New York Court of Appeals· 3/5/1970
Bradkin v. Leverton
Citations
- 26 N.Y.2d 192
- 257 N.E.2d 643
- 309 N.Y.S.2d 192
- 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that quasi-contracts “give rise to obligations more akin to those stemming from contract than from tort”
- noting that quasi-contract and tort duties are imposed by law regardless of consent
- allowing unjust-enrichment claim where plaintiff had “fully performed his part of the contract”
- “ ‘where a third party is concerned, the Statute of Frauds provides no defense to him’ ”
- “The law creates [the quasi-contractual obligation], regardless of the intention of the parties, to assure a just and equitable result.”
- “The contract is mere fiction_ The law creates it, regardless of the intention of the parties, to assure a just and equitable result.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-11-17· cited 1,648×
- Robert J. Rule v. Brine, Inc., Also Known as W.H. Brine Company, and William H. Brine, Jr.Second Circuit· 1996-06-05· cited 401×
- Georgia Malone & Co. v. RiederNew York Court of Appeals· 2012-06-28· cited 324×
- Furgang v. Lenefsky, Meier & NovodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-03-04· cited 240×
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerD.C. Circuit· 1973-05-09· cited 225×
- R.B. Ventures, Ltd. v. ShaneSecond Circuit· 1997-04-21· cited 151×
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-12-15· cited 122×
- Legros v. TarrOhio Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 113×
- Baratta v. KozlowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-06-27· cited 91×
- Perma Research & Development v. The Singer CompanySecond Circuit· 1976-07-01· cited 89×
- Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.S.D. New York· 2014-03-27· cited 81×
- Farash v. Sykes Datatronics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1983-07-12· cited 75×
- Jordan Keys & Jessamy, LLP v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-03· cited 74×
- Curtis Properties Corp. v. Greif Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-06-13· cited 60×
- Georgia Malone & Co. v. RiederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-07-07· cited 59×
- E.J. Brooks Co. v. Cambridge Sec. SealsNew York Court of Appeals· 2018-05-03· cited 52×
- Price v. Hal Roach Studios, Inc.S.D. New York· 1975-06-26· cited 50×
- Michael Kolentus v. Avco Corporation and Avco Precision Products Division, Avco Corporation, and Chemical BankSeventh Circuit· 1986-08-05· cited 45×
- Jones Lang Wootton USA v. LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-04-16· cited 45×
- Kartiganer Associates, P. C. v. Town of New WindsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-02-25· cited 38×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-03-12· cited 340×
- Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals· 1951-05-24· cited 91×
- Dentists' Supply Co. v. CorneliusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1953-03-03· cited 16×
- DENTISTS'SUPPLY CO. OF NEW YORK v. CorneliusNew York Court of Appeals· 1953-11-20· cited 15×
Other cases named Bradkin v. Leverton
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.