· 8/1/1994
Gene Autrey Adams v. Paul Metiva
Citations
- 31 F.3d 375
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19686
- 1994 WL 394087
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that use of force after suspect had been incapacitated by mace would be excessive as a matter of law
- holding that use of force after suspect had been incapacitated by mace would be excessive as a matter of law
- holding that continuing to spray mace in the face of an incapacitated arrestee would constitute excessive force
- holding that use of force after suspect had been incapacitated by mace would be excessive as a matter of law
- holding that continuing to spray mace in the face of an incapacitated arrestee would constitute excessive force
- holding that use of force after suspect had been incapacitated by mace would be excessive as a matter of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Milburn, Batchelder, Contie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.