Skip to main content

Ray v. State

Citations

  • 587 A.2d 439
  • 1991 Del. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring the declarant of the § 3507 statement testify as to the truthfulness of the statement
  • finding reversible error in the admission of a child victim’s out-of-court statements, which included using anatomically correct dolls to depict the assault, where the proper foundation under 11 Del. C. § 3507 was not provided
  • “[A] witness’ statement may be introduced only if ... the witness testifies about both the events and whether or not they are true.”
  • “[A] witness statement may be introduced only if . . . the witness testifies about both the events and whether or not they are true.”
  • discovery violations subject to reversal if substantial rights of the accused are prejudicially affected
  • improper for prosecution to imply that victim will suffer if jury finds defendant innocent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.