Skip to main content

Collins v. State

Citations

  • 56 A.3d 1012
  • 2012 Del. LEXIS 589
  • 2012 WL 5828598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no coercion where case was complex and jury deliberated for approximately two hours after issuance of an Allen charge
  • discussing Allen v. U.S., 164 U.S. 492, 17 S. Ct. 154 (1896) and its progeny
  • discussing Allen v. U.S., 164 U.S. 492, 17 S. Ct. 154 (1896) and its progeny
  • reviewing challenges to an Allen charge that were not raised at trial for plain error
  • “The potential coercive effect of an Allen charge ‘can be eliminated by having the charge include an admonition that each individual juror not surrender his or her honest convictions and not return any verdict contrary to the dictates of personal conscience.’”
  • “The potential coercive effect of an Allen charge ‘can be eliminated by having the charge include an admonition that each individual juror not surrender his or her honest convictions and not return any verdict contrary to the dictates of personal conscience.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.