Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 338 A.2d 124
  • 1975 Del. LEXIS 627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting a case-by-case approach to determining whether introduction of an out-of-court statement under § 3507 violates the Confrontation Clause because of the lack of effective cross-examination
  • rejecting requirement for “substantial” independent evidence and instead finding that “some proof” suffices
  • statements of elderly rape victim given to police and treating physician of which she had no recollection at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quillen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.