Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 897 A.2d 748
  • 2006 Del. LEXIS 163
  • 2006 WL 902229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no plain error as to defendant’s contention that the trial court, sua sponte, should have given a missing-evidence instruction
  • determining probable cause for a warrantless arrest based on informant’s tip, the Supreme Court looked to (1) the reliability of the informant, (2) the details contained in the tip; and (3) the degree of independent police corroboration
  • “In demonstrating that a forfeited error is prejudicial, the burden of persuasion is on [the defendant].”
  • “Where the informant is a known, law abiding citizen reporting a crime, the informant is considered presumptively reliable, because the informant has no connection to the criminal world and no reason to fabricate the story.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.