Supreme Court of Delaware· 7/15/1994

Jackson v. State

Citations

643 A.2d 1360
1994 Del. LEXIS 228
1994 WL 386417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that technical noncompliance with the foundational requirements of section 3507 was harmless error
holding that the State violated a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel when its agent, the defendant’s former cellmate, deliberately elicited incriminating statements from the defendant while he was incarcerated without a lawyer present
cautioning against commenting on a defendant's failure to testify as showing a lack of remorse
cautioning against commenting on a defendant’s failure to testify as showing a lack of remorse
finding that the “technical non- compliance with the foundational requirements” was harmless
distinguishing between claims raised “in the text of [an] opening brief’ and claims raised in headings and table of contends and concluding that failure to raise an argument in the text constitutes a waiver of the argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Moore, Walsh, Holland, Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

100 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.