Skip to main content

Randolph v. State

Citations

  • 36 P.3d 424
  • 117 Nev. 970
  • 117 Nev. Adv. Rep. 80
  • 2001 Nev. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defense was not prejudiced by the district court's expressions of annoyance with counsel that \numbered only two and were not extreme\
  • holding that “incorrect explanations of reasonable doubt [are] harmless error as long as the jury instruction correctly defined reasonable doubt”
  • explaining that denial of a mistrial motion \is within the district court's sound discretion\ and will not be overturned absent \a clear showing of abuse\
  • explaining that denial of a mistrial motion \is within the district court's sound discretion\
  • issuing a contemporaneous order to show cause to the attorney so he could explain why sanctions should not be imposed
  • issuing a contemporaneous order to show cause to the attorney so he could explain why sanctions should not be imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.