Nevada Supreme Court· 10/1/1997

Rippo v. State

Citations

946 P.2d 1017
113 Nev. 1239
1997 Nev. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that \[a] federal investigation of a judge does not by itself create an appearance of impropriety sufficient to warrant disqualification\
concluding that \[a] federal investigation of a judge does not by itself create an appearance of impropriety sufficient to warrant disqualification\
stating that a prosecutor’s comment to the effect that interviews and “things” happened outside the courtroom were improper references to evidence not presented at trial
stating that a prosecutor's comment to the effect that interviews and \things\ happened outside the courtroom were improper references to evidence not presented at trial
observing that there was no evidence \that the State was .. . involved in the federal investigation . . . of [the trial judge]\
observing that there was no evidence \that the State was .. . involved in the federal investigation . . . of [the trial judge]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rippo v. State

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.