Skip to main content

Bridges v. State

Citations

  • 6 P.3d 1000
  • 1 Nev. 752
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 84
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that sufficient evidence for first-degree kidnapping existed where the defendant used a ruse to lure the victim \for the purpose of killing him\
  • stating that a defendant with narcissistic personality disorder can be competent and capable of self-representation
  • noting that a direct comment by the prosecutor on a defendant's failure to testify violates his constitutional right against self- incrimination
  • applying the Chapman standard where the prosecutor referred to the defendant's assertion of his constitutional right not to testify
  • applying the Chapman standard where the prosecutor referred to the defendant’s assertion of his constitutional right not to testify
  • indicating that this court reweighed based on a \review of the trial record\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.