Nevada Supreme Court· 8/23/2000
Bridges v. State
Citations
- 6 P.3d 1000
- 1 Nev. 752
- 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 84
- 2000 Nev. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that sufficient evidence for first-degree kidnapping existed where the defendant used a ruse to lure the victim \for the purpose of killing him\
- stating that a defendant with narcissistic personality disorder can be competent and capable of self-representation
- noting that a direct comment by the prosecutor on a defendant's failure to testify violates his constitutional right against self- incrimination
- applying the Chapman standard where the prosecutor referred to the defendant's assertion of his constitutional right not to testify
- applying the Chapman standard where the prosecutor referred to the defendant’s assertion of his constitutional right not to testify
- indicating that this court reweighed based on a \review of the trial record\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Valdez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-11-26· cited 368×
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-07-28· cited 282×
- People v. KoontzCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 112×
- Colwell v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-18· cited 107×
- Allred v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-07-12· cited 54×
- Leslie v. WardenNevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-18· cited 41×
- Randolph v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2001-12-14· cited 32×
- Ford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-20· cited 14×
- United States v. Tavares ChandlerNinth Circuit· 2014-02-20· cited 12×
- Gray (Schemaj) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-12-14
- Boyd (Keair) v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2022-01-13
- CARTER (TYLER) v. STATE (CRIMINAL)Nevada Supreme Court· 2026-05-14
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.